George Will's column in today's Washington Post (syndicated nationally) discusses the No Child Left Behind Act and the fuzzy math that can accompany funding. LINK
Common sense and conservatism, which are usually similar, said that the No Child Left Behind law, which vastly expanded the federal government's supervision of education from kindergarten through 12th grade, was problematic for two reasons: A few of the 50 state governors are apt to be wise innovators, so let policymaking remain at state and local levels. And when Washington makes a mistake, as it has been known to do, it is a continental mistake.
The federal government has recently made one that subverts a promising development in education at the state level. That development is the 65 percent requirement: 65 percent of every school district's education operational budget should be spent on classroom instruction.
Nationally, 61.3 percent is so spent. The 3.7 percentage point difference amounts to nearly $15 billion, which could pay for 370,000 teachers at $40,000 apiece, or a computer for every K-12 student in the country. Only three states today hit the 65 percent target. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia spend less than 60 percent.
And:
But in July the National Center for Education Statistics, part of the U.S. Education Department, undermined this national effort. A report on expenditures for public elementary and secondary education for the 2003-04 school year contained this finding: "The percentage of current expenditures spent on instruction and instruction-related activities was 66.1 percent in 2003-04 for the nation as a whole" (emphasis added). Seasoned students of government verbiage noted the suspiciously vague phrase "instruction-related activities."
Opacity is a sign of insincerity: Government language becomes opaque as the government's conscience becomes uneasy. When no Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were found, the U.S. government began speaking foggily of finding "weapons of mass destruction-related program activities."
Now that Americans' concern is shifting from how much money is spent on education to how much education the money is buying, government has blurred the measurement in a way that says 66.1 percent of education dollars already reach the classroom. If the "instruction-related" criterion is not added, the percentage of dollars devoted to instruction has declined for five consecutive years, to 61.3.
And:
Warren Buffett has written that "yardsticks seldom are discarded while yielding favorable readings," but when readings are unfavorable, "a more flexible measurement system often suggests itself: Just shoot the arrow of business performance into a blank canvas and then carefully draw the bull's-eye around the implanted arrow."
No Child Left Behind supposedly promotes education accountability by mandating reliable data to measure progress. But Washington looks like an untrustworthy manipulator of data when it uses the phrase "instruction-related activity" to draw a bull's-eye around the status quo.
Very nice write up. Easy to understand and straight to the point.
It's really nice post and you did a really good job
Posted by: Custom term papers | November 15, 2009 at 11:48 PM
Very good post. I have been searching for this post since many days. Now I have implemented the same for my site.
Posted by: Term Papers | December 09, 2009 at 05:30 AM
Interesting article as for me. It would be great to read a bit more about that topic.
Posted by: air yeezy | May 05, 2010 at 02:43 AM
Hi I liked your note, add your site to your bookmarks.
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Do you have a viable business but lack the necessary finances to get it off it’s feet?
Posted by: Buy_Viagra | September 16, 2010 at 11:11 PM
Do you have a viable business but lack the necessary finances to get it off it’s feet?
Posted by: Music_master | September 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM
buy cialis buy cialis at a discount buy cialis brand buy cialis by the pill buy cialis canada buy cialis cheap buy cialis cheaper online buy cialis mexico buy cialis omline buy cialis online 20mg buy cialis online site buy cialis online viagra buy cialis pharmacy buy cialis pills generic
Posted by: Hot_cialis | October 30, 2010 at 12:16 PM
cialis soft generic cialis soft order cialis soft tab description cialis soft tab india cialis soft tablets cialis soft tabs 10 mg cialis soft tabs bestseller cialis soft tabs online cialis soft top cialis softabs cialis softabs generic cialis softtab how works cialis softtabs online
Posted by: RX-order | November 20, 2010 at 06:13 AM
The new year is already knocking at the door, let it will bring only happiness and joy.
Posted by: Antivirus_man | December 06, 2010 at 08:00 AM
Hi, I congratulate you on Merry Christmas!
Posted by: JOBS_frend | December 26, 2010 at 06:56 AM
Interesting site, always a new topic .. good luck in the new 2011. Happy New Year!
Posted by: school_dubl | December 29, 2010 at 01:05 PM
With the new 2011. Year! Congratulations.
Posted by: Realestate | January 11, 2011 at 12:13 AM
Happy New Year! Happiness and success in 2011.
Posted by: Rental | January 15, 2011 at 04:04 AM
Happy New Year! Happiness and success in 2011.
Posted by: Rental | January 20, 2011 at 03:15 AM
Happy New Year! The author write more I liked it.
Posted by: Hotjobs | January 25, 2011 at 01:53 AM
It's verbally good. I'm convinced.
Posted by: nitric oxide | August 02, 2011 at 10:45 PM