Yesterday, we told you that the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to take up cases from Louisville, KY and Seattle, WA, dealing with affirmative action. There is a great deal of press today. The best single resource is Howard Bashman's How Appealing which links to the various news reports. LINK
The New York Times' Supreme Court correspondent Linda Greenhouse has an article, "Court to weigh race as factor in school rolls." LINK
The eventual decision on whether they can take race into account could affect hundreds of school systems in all areas of the country. The court accepted challenges to plans in Louisville, Ky., where the schools were once racially segregated by law, and in Seattle, where segregation was never official but was widespread because of residential patterns.
SCOTUS Blog's Lyle Denniston has informed analysis. LINK
Last October, judges on the Ninth Circuit Court observed that "the Supreme Court has never decided a case involving the consideration of race in a voluntarily imposed school assignment plan intended to promote racially and ethnically diverse [public] schools." A year ago, judges on the First Circuit Court said much the same thing: the Supreme Court "has not yet considered a constitutional challenge to a voluntary race-based transfer policy for elementary and secondary schools..." The Court had a chance to consider that issue last December, but passed up the chance. Now, with a change in composition, the Court has opted to take it on. There may be a connection.
In more than a half-century of dealing with racial issues in the public schools, the Court has not ruled on a case in which race is not used as a way to separate the races in the K-12 grades, in which race is not used to provide a benefit to one race but not to others, and in which racial assignments or busing are not used to dismantle official segregation of schools, classrooms or faculties. In other words, the new generation of cases on schools and race are not the traditional kind under the original 19th Century purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. "We are here working from doctrines concerning the use of race-based criteria that are mainly the product of 20th Century jurisprudence," remarked First Circuit Judge Michael Boudin.